Backcountry Greenwich, Is It The Best Part of Greenwich?


This slideshow requires JavaScript.

The backcountry WAS the epitome of Greenwich when I was growing up in the 80’s, at least that’s how it felt to me back then. Many young families lived in the backcountry and we didn’t have to go far to drive to our friend’s houses. It meant you had land, privacy and some even had horses right in their backyard…and it still means that today so why are people afraid of the backcountry? Most people I work with want to see houses closer to town, mostly due to convenience, but are they missing out on the best part of Greenwich?

Backcountry Greenwich offers privacy, quiet and space that you generally won’t find closer to town. Beautiful stone walls, rolling hills, wildlife and horse farms make this part of town desirable to anyone who dreams about living in the country but doesn’t want to be far from the city.  You can get to NYC in only 45 minutes.

But one of the best reasons to consider living north of the Merritt are the prices! You can purchase a larger home with more acreage for less money and lower taxes and you probably won’t end up in a bidding war. Isn’t that worth driving an extra 5 minutes? I think so…but I’d like to hear what others think.

What do you love about the backcountry? Please share your comments below.

If you’re in the market for a new house and you’d like to learn more about Greenwich, contact Stefanie Lacoff:


Call or text: 203-536-9403 

You can search all listings on the MLS here 



Smoke and Carbon Monoxide detector laws

New CT Smoke & Carbon Monoxide Detector Law Is Creating Closing Problems


Mortgage and Lending with George Souto NMLS #65149 FHA, CHFA, VA Mortgages Connecticut NMLS #65149
February 18, 2014 12:19 AM

Connecticut adopt a new Smoke & Carbon Monoxide Detector Law on January 1, 2014.  The law was past with good intentions, but like anything else no matter what the intention is if it isn’t thoroughly thought out it creates issue.  That is the case with Connecticut’s new Smoke & Carbon Monoxide Detector Law, because it is obvious those who created and passed this legislation do not have knowledge of Lending Guidelines, and the Closing process.  As a result theNew CT Smoke & Carbon Monoxide Detector Law Is Creating Closing Problems.

The law in of itself seems Innocent enough, for example the new law:

  • Applies to any residential property designed to be occupied by 1-2 family built prior to October 1, 2005.  These properties must have both a smoke and carbon monoxide detector.
  • Homes built prior to October 1, 2005 are already required to have smoke and carbon monoxide detectors hardwired in the home.
  • Detectors may be battery operated instead of hardwired, unless the building code when the house was built required the smoke and carbon monoxide detectors to be hardwired.  For example homes built on or after October 1, 1985 are required to have hardwired smoke detectors here in CT,  and homes built on or after October 1, 2005 are required to have smoke and carbon monoxide detectors hardwired.
  • All carbon monoxide detectors must have the capability of displaying the carbon monoxide concentration in parts per million (digital readout).
  • All smoke and carbon monoxide detectors must must have the capability of producing a warning alarm.
  • Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors must be installed per manufacture’s instructions.
  • For homes constructed prior to the dates smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were required by building code, need to have the proper number of battery operated smoke and carbon monoxide detectors instructed by the manufacturer, as well as the placement of the detectors.

All of the above seems pretty straight forward.  However, the Closing problems this new Smoke & Carbon Monoxide Detector Law is creating is because of the next set part of the law:

  • Seller will be asked to sign an affidavit and swear under oath at the Closing the property is equipt with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, and that they are in working order at the time of the Closing.
  • The oath must be given, and notarized by a Notary or Attorney at the Closing.
  • If the Seller does not want to provide an affidavit, the Seller must then provide the Buyer with a $250 credit towards the purchase of the house house at Closing.

Attorneys have been advised by the Connecticut Bar Association to tell Sellers they are representing to not sign the affidavit, and to credit the Buyer with $250.  This in of itself does not necessarily present a problem.  The problem is with the Seller making the choice of signing the affidavit or providing the $250 credit at Closing.

If the Seller follows the Attorneys advice, which they are sure to do, a NEWHUD-1 needs to be drawn up.  This means the Closing will be held up until a HUD-1 is amended to reflect the $250, and the Lender has had the opportunity to review the NEW HUD-1 and approve it.

Further, more if the Seller is already providing the Buyer with Seller Paid Closing Costs, an even bigger problem may arise if the Seller is already providing the maximum contribution.  The Buyer does not have an option to waive the $250 credit, so most likely the Sales Contract would have to be amended to reduce the original Seller Paid Closing Cost by $250.  This new law has only been in place for approximately 5 weeks, and New CT Smoke & Carbon Monoxide Detector Law Is Already Creating Closing Problems. Delayed Closings could also result in Interest Rate expirations resulting ineven more Closing Costs.

The law needs to be amended to allow for the affidavit to be signed or the $250 credit to be given well before the Closing so that the HUD-1 and all other Closing Documents are correct, and reviewed before the Closing.  If the Connecticut State Legislators do not take action on this soon, there will be many very unhappy Sellers and Buyers until they do.